Stock Market Beat

Our beat: The stock market. Our job: Beat it.

Subscribe to this blog

BSC: Why Paying $5 Per Share for Bear Stearns Might Make Sense

Tags: Bear Stearns (BSC), JPMorgan Chase (JPM), JPM, BSC
19 Mar 6:05pm
Read original blog entry

By all accounts, JPMorgan (JPM) has all the leverage to complete its proposed acquisition of Bear Stearns (BSC) for $2.00 per share. Actually, since it is a stock deal and JPMorgan shares have risen since the announcement, the acquisition price is now $2.40 per share.

Still, for a deal likely to be made at $2.40 per share, why would anyone be willing to pay $5.00 per share for the stock today? One answer that keeps getting bandied about is that bondholders are buying the stock in order to vote for the deal, as it is worth losing some money on the stock to preserve the value of the bonds.

That argument makes some sense, but I believe it doesn’t tell the whole story. It is possible for the bondholders to not only preserve the value of their bonds, but to lose very little on the stock in the process.

While the stock has been getting all the news, options on Bear Stearns have seen enormous trading volume. I think the bondholders are buying the stock, but hedging their bets by creating synthetic short positions.

A synthetic short consists of writing a call option and buying a put. Here’s how I think a bondholder can be playing this:

Buy 100 shares for $5
Write an October $5 call option for 2.10 (bid price as I write this)

Buy an October $5 put for $2.45 (ask price as I write this)

Net cost for this transaction is $5.00 + 2.45 - 2.10 = $5.35. At expiration, it will be worth $5.00 no matter where the stock is trading. So, for $0.35 per share, or $35 for every $500 of exposure, the bondholders can buy the right to vote on the deal.

Given that the bonds were trading at $700 per $1,000 face value on Friday, and are worth $1,000 when backed by JPMorgan, it is pretty simple math. For every $1,000 of bond exposure, you can pay $70 to vote in favor of a deal that is worth $300 to you.

What’s more, since there was so much more debt than equity, only a small fraction of the bondholders need to make this bet to gain an overwhelming majority of the equity votes.  Or, each bondholder could insure a smaller portion of their value.

Taking that into consideration, paying $5.00 for the stock starts to make sense.

Provided, that is, you already own the bonds.

Comments

Back to top

Post comment

Back to top

Post a comment

Please login to post a comment

About

BillTrent

Stock Market Beat editor William A. Trent, CFA, has been an equity analyst since 1996 and is co-author of Understanding and Evaluating Prospectuses, Offering Documents, and Proxy Statements. Prior to starting Stock Market Beat he was Senior Equity Analyst for New Amsterdam Partners LLC, a $6 billion institutional asset manager. His experience covers all market-cap sizes and is primarily within the TMT (Telecom, Media and Technology) and Transportation sectors. He is also the senior editor of Financial Education. He is available for freelance writing and consulting projects and can be contacted here. He is not, however, a registered investment advisor and will not accept funds for management.